Skip to content

Early Decision vs. Restrictive Early Action: A Comparison


Choosing the right college and navigating the college admissions process can be a daunting task for high school students. One important decision that students often face is whether to apply through an early decision (ED) or Restrictive early action (REA) program. Both options offer advantages and disadvantages, and it is crucial for students to understand the key differences between the two. In this article, we will compare early decision and restrictive early action, exploring their similarities, differences, and the implications they have on students’ college admissions journey.

Understanding Early Decision

Early decision is a binding agreement between a student and a college. When a student applies through early decision, they commit to attending the college if accepted. This means that if the student is admitted, they are obligated to withdraw all other college applications and enroll at the early decision institution. Early decision deadlines typically fall in November, and students receive their admission decisions in December.

There are several key aspects to consider when it comes to early decision:

  • Higher acceptance rates: Many colleges have higher acceptance rates for early decision applicants compared to regular decision applicants. This is because early decision demonstrates a student’s strong interest in the college, and colleges want to fill a portion of their incoming class with committed students.
  • Binding commitment: Applying through early decision is a significant commitment. Students must carefully consider their top-choice college and be confident in their decision to attend if admitted. Breaking an early decision agreement can have serious consequences, such as being blacklisted from other colleges.
  • Financial implications: Early decision applicants are often required to submit a binding financial aid agreement along with their application. This means that students must be prepared to accept the financial aid package offered by the college, regardless of whether it meets their expectations or needs.
See also  Early Decision and the College Application Timeline

Exploring Restrictive Early Action

Restrictive early action, also known as single-choice early action or non-binding early action, is a less restrictive option compared to early decision. Under restrictive early action, students can apply to other colleges through early action or regular decision programs, and they are not obligated to attend the college if admitted. The main difference between restrictive early action and regular decision is the earlier application deadline and earlier notification of admission decisions.

Here are some key points to consider about restrictive early action:

  • Non-binding commitment: Unlike early decision, restrictive early action is non-binding. Students have the freedom to choose among multiple colleges and can wait until regular decision to make their final decision.
  • Early notification: One of the main advantages of restrictive early action is the early notification of admission decisions. Students typically receive their decisions in December or January, allowing them to plan their college applications and financial aid strategies accordingly.
  • Increased competition: Restrictive early action programs tend to be highly competitive. Since students are not bound to attend if admitted, colleges often receive a larger pool of applicants. This means that the acceptance rates for restrictive early action may be lower compared to early decision.

Comparing Early Decision and Restrictive Early Action

Now that we have explored the key features of early decision and restrictive early action, let’s compare the two options side by side:

Aspect Early Decision Restrictive Early Action
Binding commitment Yes No
Application deadline November November
Notification of admission decision December December/January
Acceptance rates Higher compared to regular decision May be lower compared to early decision
Financial aid commitment Binding Non-binding
See also  The Role of Demonstrated Interest in Early Action

While early decision and restrictive early action share some similarities, such as the early application deadlines and notification of admission decisions, their key differences lie in the binding commitment and financial aid implications. Early decision requires students to commit to attending the college if admitted, while restrictive early action allows students to keep their options open.

Considerations for Students

When deciding between early decision and restrictive early action, students should carefully consider their individual circumstances and preferences. Here are some factors to take into account:

  • College choice: If a student has a clear top-choice college and is confident in their decision to attend if admitted, early decision may be a suitable option. However, if a student is still exploring their college options or wants to compare financial aid packages, restrictive early action provides more flexibility.
  • Financial considerations: Early decision applicants must be prepared to accept the financial aid package offered by the college, even if it is not ideal. Students who require a comprehensive financial aid package or need to compare offers from multiple colleges may find restrictive early action more advantageous.
  • Competitiveness: Early decision acceptance rates are often higher compared to regular decision, but they can still be competitive. Students should research the acceptance rates and admission statistics of their target colleges to determine their chances of admission.
  • Application readiness: Applying through early decision or restrictive early action requires students to have their application materials, such as essays and recommendation letters, prepared well in advance. Students should assess their readiness and ensure they have enough time to submit a strong application.
See also  Early Decision vs. Early Action: Which Is Right for You?


Choosing between early decision and restrictive early action is a significant decision for high school students. While early decision offers a binding commitment and higher acceptance rates, restrictive early action provides more flexibility and allows students to compare offers from multiple colleges. Students should carefully consider their college choices, financial circumstances, and application readiness before making a decision. Ultimately, the choice between early decision and restrictive early action should align with a student’s goals, preferences, and individual circumstances.

By understanding the similarities and differences between early decision and restrictive early action, students can make an informed decision that sets them on the path to a successful college admissions journey.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *